Turn Advertising Off
 
Movie Showtimes & Tickets
Showtimes By City or Zip Code:
Film Search:
    DVD News      DVD Release Dates      HD/Blu-Ray Release Dates      UMD Release Dates      Easter Eggs      DVD Reviews      Blu-Ray Reviews      HDDVD Reviews

"Great Companion Piece to the Original Superman."

Richard Donner succeeds in breathing new life into the sequel, with an originally-intended script by Tom Mankiewicz. Overpowers Lester's version.Some continuity errors.
"The construction goes beyond any architectural theory."

-Lex Luthor, on the Fortress of Solitude (from simply looking around)

Thanks to Warner Bros. producer Michael Thau and the internet (exclusively the sites Capedwonder.com, Supermancinema.co.uk, and TheForbidden-Zone.com), we now have an alternate version of Superman II, unarguably the best of the Superman film series, and still the best comic book film to date in lots of people's opinions. The informative website Wikipedia elaborates on the story to get this project up-and-rolling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman_II:_The_Richard_Donner_Cut), and also details the rich history of the film. The theatrical release of II, directed by Richard Lester, who took over the film after the Salkinds' falling-out with Richard Donner (the original Superman director), is a more comedic, rushed, and non-canonical film, filling the needs of the Warner Bros. studio, who were by then becoming more involved and controlling creativity over their projects.

As the first Superman film and its sequel were filmed consecutively, original director Richard Donner had photographed about 80% of the film, when he was asked to stop filming footage for the second and concentrate on the first, in an attempt by the studio to control budget spending and reach the desired release date (which they had already postponed in 1977). He did so, and when the first film proved successful and it was time to finish the sequel, issues with Marlon Brando (wanting an alleged 11.75% of box office revenue) and the studio wanting to take over creative control from Donner resulted in the omitting of any Jor-El scenes, as well as Warner Bros. hiring replacement director Richard Lester to complete the unfinished film. Gene Hackman declined to return for any reshoots by Lester, which cut down the number of scenes in which he appears. The Salkinds also rewrote the Tom Mankiewicz script, leading to a very different film than originally intended. However, after the release of Superman: The Movie on DVD in the 2000s, fans on the Internet continually wrote Warner Brothers asking that the Donner version of II be reassembled and released. There was a lot of legal wrangling in getting the rights to Marlon Brando's Jor-El performance for use in Bryan Singer's Superman Returns, and upon winning those rights back, Warner decided to hire Michael Thau to reassemble the film for a DVD release. Thau was able to secure the participation of Donner, and in late 2006, Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut was released.

The film in itself is dedicated to Christopher Reeve, who if it wasn't for him, the entire series would not have been as successful. The picture starts out with restored footage of Marlon Brando as Jor-El, one of the greatest scientists of Krypton, banishing the triple threat of General Zod, Ursa, and Non inside the Phantom Zone, as we saw in the first flick. The threat of Zod on Krypton is never revealed in the movies, but from what I have gathered he was a military General who attempted to take control, and discredit Jor-El in the process. As Krypton's red sun explodes, taking the planet (and potentially the entire solar system) with it, Kal-El's spacecraft is seen speeding past the trapped Phantom Zone villains. This part really makes no sense to me, as, being a Superman fan, I thought that the Phantom Zone was an alternate dimension, not some physical mirror floating through space ... ??

The beginning titles are in the same fashion as the original Superman, with the blue lettering font instead of the white Lester versions. The score from Superman I by John Williams is also reprised here, taken directly from 1978. These little details really add to the overall feeling that ties it in with the first movie, as compared to the breakaway campiness of Lester's film. Also gone is the beginning intro of the Paris Eiffel Tower terrorist scene, as well as the Orange Juice-gag (although references are made to it), Supes throwing his S-shield, the Clark/Lois memory-wipe kiss, and most of the comedic scenes, which lead to a more serious, passionate take on the Superman mythology. Richard Donner was known in this series as the passionate Superman director, he took inspiration from the comics, as well as his creative consultant/screenwriter Tom Mandiewicz, unlike later films, including Superman Returns.

As just mentioned, there are lines that reflect the nonexistent OJ gag (where Clark originally gets his hand stuck in the blender), like for instance, a scene in Niagra Falls where Clark runs off to get hot dogs and OJ for Lois and replies to her, "Freshly squeezed, I know." Also there is a scene later in the Fortress of Solitude where Superman pops a bottle of champagne and says, "I thought we might abandon the orange juice for once." These scenes might have made more sense if the original scene were there. There are more attempts made by Lois to prove to herself that Clark really is Superman, as seen from the start of the film, and an added screen test amidst the Niagra Falls scenes, which replaces nonexistant footage. Also different in this version is the continuity error where Kal-El and Lois make love before he attempts to become mortal. In Bryan Singer's universe, this would make sense, as Superman still has his powers when he has sex with Lois (wouldn't that harm her?), and therefore she is able to get pregnant and bear a child with powers... (Not to go off on that issue. Maybe one day I shall review Singer's career mistake, Returns, and tell that story.) I don't know if this scene is present in the original (I will have to go buy all the DVDs), but when Lois wakes up, she walks out half-naked in Supes' costumed shirt covering her panties and sees Kal-El talking to his father about becoming mortal. Jor-El also acknowledges her presence by looking at her while Kal-El is in the crystal chamber.

Another continuity error that I noticed is the inclusion of city elements such as the World Trade Center's twin towers and Lady Liberty. Metropolis...or New York?? In the end scenes, Superman is depicted destroying his Fortress using his heat vision (implausible?), and rewinding and fast-forwarding Earth (making some people forget, some people not forgetting - see Rocky or Lex in Returns). The scene with Rocky also depicts another error - in the fashion that the location of the diner where Clark gets in a fight, is depicted as being in the North Pole, as Superman just lost his powers and Lois and Clark are looking for a place to eat way out there. Yet, in the very last scene, Clark ends up in the diner after leaving the Daily Planet and agreeing to make a "pizza run" for Lois?? As well, Rocky remembers Clark after Superman has just rewound Earth...? Huh??

Acting follows up the 1978 original movie, which is simply expanded upon here. As these two films were shot together, the acting is as good as it was in the first, with more emphasis on Margot Kidder's Lois Lane and Christopher Reeve. Directing goes hands-down to Richard Donner. And the visuals are great, not the best, but hey, this movie came out in 1980. There are some added effects to this version, however, but in the style of the effects of the 80's, as opposed to today's computer-generated images. They encompass a version that is ultimately better than its counterpart.

The special features are sparse, but buying a DVD like this, you can't expect much, as this is a "Director's Cut" of sorts. Buy the Richard Lester 2-Disc Special Edition of Superman II if you are looking for extras. Yet the ones that come with this version are great in their own right.

Introduction by Richard Donner
This is an almost-2:00 intro by Donner thanking the fans, explaining the tedious process of restoring the film to its original vision and expanding upon his take of the sequel's story.

Commentary by Director Richard Donner and Creative Consultant Tom Mankiewicz
A very enlightening commentary. These two guys are the sole responsible for the story of this film, and are the two who would shed the most input. Donner especially elaborates specifically on the details of the series, explaining the issues with the studio, Brando, and how the sequels would have followed - with Tom directing the third and Donner coming back for the fourth. The studio obviously didn't recognize the passion for original, true-to-the-source visions like most do now (okay, not all, but some).

Superman II: Restoring the Vision Featurette
The mammer-jammer of this DVD's special features, "Restoring the Vision" explains everything having to do with creating this version of part 2, Donner's involvement, and anything else a Superman II fan could ask for.

Deleted Scenes
6 restored scenes from the vaults.

 
The Look
The picture is presented in widescreen format. As what is expected from 1980.
 
 
The Sound
Offered is a Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround sound track. Subtitles: English, French & Spanish.
 
 
The Packaging
Boasting, "Originally Conceived and Intended," and "The Version You Have Never Seen," the DVD has very nice cover artwork, which stands apart from the Deluxe and Special Editions of the other films in the series - in a similar way that 1984's Supergirl does. No insert or booklet.
 
A nostalgic film epic, Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut exceeds where the theatrical Superman II does not. It feels like a more complete film, and a true companion piece to Superman: The Movie. Not as campy or comedic, Richard Donner displays deeper meaning to the mythology and brings a passion from the comic books not seen until its predecessor in 1978, as compared to Richard Lester, who rushed to finish another director's film and destroyed the series with the next installment. Recommended for Superman fans is the Superman 2006 4-Disc Special Edition (reissue), Supergirl [Director's Cut], "Superman: The Animated Series" Vols. 1-3, and Superman: Doomsday.

* The Superman series - an un-altering, ubiquitous continuity? I don't think so. However, that resembles the comic book's continuity as well.

+ Interested in the original Superman III script treatment written by Ilya Salkind, and featuring Supergirl and villains Brainiac and Mr. Mxyzptlk? Copy/paste this URL:

http://www.supermancinema.co.uk/superman3/general/script/s3_original_idea.pdf


15 Comments & Responses


September 8th, 2008 2:47am
Thanks Blaze, I left a response on your profile it's kinda long due to the fact that I took the Spidey 4 info off my page and pasted it.
 
September 8th, 2008 12:40am
awsome review web head not sure bout that ? u asked though im a marvel man myself,an my wife didnt read the comics until after we got 2gether. (a condition 4 me 2 date her jk hahaha) so whats the good word on spidey 4?
 
September 7th, 2008 1:50pm
My first official review...
 
September 7th, 2008 1:36am
Clearly.
 
September 7th, 2008 1:34am
Yes, but they are clearly fake.

BlizZzard
 
September 7th, 2008 1:29am
Aha, he's got some cool posters.
 
September 7th, 2008 1:26am
Yes I know, and I too am more familiar with Batman and Spider-Man legend, but the reason why the versus concept came about, was because I was on Movienerds profile and notice his "posters", so I thought I'd share what I was thinking of, that pertained to Superman.

BizZzard
 
September 7th, 2008 12:59am
Yes, I agree with you there, MB123. I agree that Brainiac should have been the sole contender. Supergirl had her own movie in 1984, and it was a little campy. Thank God that Christopher Reeve didn't make a cameo in that one like was originally intended. But yes, Mxyzptlk doesn't have a film presence, no need to include him. But they could have ran with the idea of Brainiac. I think he's definitely a strong enough character to hold down a movie by himself. After I saw Superman II, I thought that they were doing it right - going by the comic books, that is, until Lester took over. They did do I and II right. But then with III they completely went off-track and in IV they made up their own villain and story. Even Returns was a thought up story by Singer and his writers. I just think that they should have utilized the 60+ years of comic history and adapted comic book storylines for the sequels, or at least villains from the comic, like Metallo or Brainiac.

And Blizz... I like Batman just as much, if not better. I know his mythology to a tee, just like I know Spidey's whole history. Batman and Superman are friends in the comics, yet they tend to disagree with each other's methods, but hey, they're the leaders of the JLA, I don't think we would ever see a fight.
 
September 7th, 2008 12:46am
CBF I do and don't know what your talking about, I know about the different Kryptonite's, I basically or generally know of the characters and villains but like I said its been a long time since I have seen these movies, and I'm not a Superman fan, so as to not erupt a fight, I think Batman is the best and could kick Superman's ass, and Spider-Man's bitch ass, but Iron-Man vs. Batman, that's a fight I wont to see.

MovieBuff watch your heels, I'm coming ; )

BlizZzard out, OH
 
September 7th, 2008 12:44am
Brainiac would've been a good idea for Superman III, but I can see why Warner Brothers didn't like it. Adding Supergirl and Mr. Mxyzptlk as well would've hurt the movie... not that it did well anyway.

Just like Robin should NOT be added to the new Batman series by Christopher Nolan, neither should Supergirl with Superman. Too campy... that's what happened to III and IV in the Superman series... it didn't take itself serious.

I read the outline of the script you posted above and I disliked it myself. Somehow adding Brainiac in the mix would've been cool, but not the other two.
 
September 7th, 2008 12:42am
Thanks again, MB123.

I really do think that this tops all the films, well maybe Superman and Superman II are equal, as the first is a classic. But in terms of villains, Superman II beats them all. It's quite surprising a film from 1980 could beat a film from 2006. Superman Returns had some decent action scenes, specifically the plane scene and awesome visuals, but like I said, Zod has been the top villain in this series. Not Luthor, not Nuclear Man. Zod.

And Richard Donner did make attempts in this version to not be as campy, he took out a lot of campy footage and/or replaced them with alternate takes or new scenes altogether. It is definitely worth checking out, it sheds new light on this story. I remember saying, "I don't remember that happening," and so it didn't. This is just the original take on it, the take that was meant to be but wasn't.
 
September 7th, 2008 12:27am
Blizz... CBF has joined our team and is now an official reviewer. Congratulations is in order.

And Richard Pryor stars in Superman III... not this one.

CBF.... great review... I actually want to go rent this one out now... and see the comparison between the two versions myself. I, too, think that Superman II is the best of the series but was a little too campy. I'll check it out soon. And welcome to the team once again. ;)
 
September 7th, 2008 12:10am
The one you're thinking of, BlizZ, is "Superman III," in which Richard Pryor overshadows Christopher Reeve for screen time and Superman battles two sides of his personality after becoming exposed to synthetic Kryptonite. Which, I think is based on Red Kryptonite, which turns Superman dark in the comics.

From Wikipedia:
"Series producer Ilya Salkind originally wrote a treatment for this film that included Brainiac, Mister Mxyzptlk and Supergirl, but Warner Bros. did not like it." That's the link at the end.

The 'supercomputer' idea in that movie was a replacement for Brainiac, which I feel is the villain they should have used. So far, no villain in any of the Superman sequels has topped General Zod in "Superman II." Brainiac needs to be the next villain should they make another.
 
September 6th, 2008 10:50pm
One of the best, amazing review.
 
September 6th, 2008 10:14pm
Holly shit are you official now, or is this the new format for DVDs, or are you just a Movie web creator and/or web editor, and sadly to say I haven't seen this movie version nor, seen most of the Superman movie, I have seen four of them, 1, 2, and 3, and the new one, but once and along time ago, and as you may or may not now I am a big Batman fan. I did love The Louis and Clark adventures, and you might find, what I'm about to say, wrong or untrue, but I see only two people as Superman, Dean Cain and Christopher Reeves

and Yes it would harm her, just like they said in Mallrats, it would blow out her back, are kill her, but Broodie said everything I could say,

I like this review very much so, I'm going to have rewatch these movies to, to up my superman knowledge, I wish I could say I agree with this review, but you know drill, so I'll say exemplary review.

Oh yeah was Richard Pryor in this one, and if so was this one the one with evil superman, or not, I cant really remember

BlizZzard
 

4
  Stars
The Feature:
The Picture:
The Sound:
The Extras:
Replay Value:
Reviewed: September 6th, 2008
CBF's Profile
CBF
More of My Reviews:
Was this review helpful?

1 Users

0 Users
Average Score:
3 Stars
Viewing
2 of 2